We know
that things are not always as they seem. In our desire to come to quick
conclusions we can sometimes come to quick wrong conclusions. In
one of the “Elijah Stories” of the Jewish tradition, Elijah dressed in the
rags of a beggar and knocked at the door of a home where a wedding
celebration was being held. The father of the bride opened the door, and
Elijah asked if there was room in the party for one like him. The man
slammed the door in Elijah’s face. Elijah returned again to the wedding
celebration, this time dressed in the garb of a fine gentleman. This time
he was welcomed with great respect. Elijah entered the house, went over
to the table, and stuffed food into his vest and shirt pockets and poured
wine over his clothes. When the host came rushing over, demanding an
explanation, Elijah replied:
“When I, Elijah, came to your
house in the rags of a beggar, I was refused entry. When I, the same
Elijah, came to our house in the clothes of a gentleman, I was admitted.
I could only conclude that you invited my clothes to the feast.
So, I have proceeded to feed them.” (John Shea, Elijah at the
Wedding Feast and Other Tales: Stories of the Human Spirit [Chicago:
ACTA Publications, 1999], 27-28).
Things are not always as they seem. To judge
Elijah by his clothes was not to see Elijah at all. The ability of
people to see, including the disciples of Jesus, who Christ really
is obscured as well. Some think he is John the Baptist, some believe him
to be Elijah (the prophet, not necessarily the character in the above
story), some discerned him to be one of the prophets. Through faith
revealed by God Peter was able to make his initial profession, “You are
the Christ.”
As
dramatic as this answer is, Peter’s creed was still not fully developed.
It would not take Councils and Catechisms for Peter to come to a deeper
understanding of truth; it was the Cross. Peter understood the question
of Jesus, “Who do people (others) say that I am?” in his Middle Eastern
world. In our Western context we may miss the point of the question of
Jesus completely.
In our
world today we develop “a keen sense of individualism, self-reliance,
independence from others, and personal competence.” (John Pilch, The
Cultural World of Jesus: Sunday by Sunday, Cycle B), Liturgical
Press, 1996, 137. In the Middle East, one’s identity is formed by the
family to which one belongs: “the fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree”
is an understanding which comes quite naturally. You know a person by his
or her family, would be the presumed understanding.
It’s not
quite the same for us. We pride ourselves in our individualism: “I don’t
care what others think of me,” “I have to do it my way,” or “You just
don’t understand me, I have to live my truth.” Our culture prizes
and rewards self actualization, independence and uniqueness. These are
not necessarily shared values for the people of Jesus’ day. His question,
“Who do others say that I am?” is a question rooted in the cultural
“expectations of the group and never to frustrate or surpass those
expectations. The stubborn and rebellious son would be killed
(Deuteronomy 21:18-21).” (Pilch, 137.)
By
leaving the expectations of the group, by denying self and taking up a
cross, Jesus exhorts his disciples to join a new family to juxtapose the
expectation of belonging with the new realities of the Kingdom of God.
This moving from the assumption that he was John the Baptist, Elijah, or
one of the Prophets to Peter’s declaration that he is the Christ is a bold
move to thinking like God, rather than thinking as human beings think.
God,
indeed, is always doing something new.
True
Messiahship involves the Cross, not merely and individual Cross for Jesus,
but the Cross that we all share because we living in Him.
Messiahship is intricately connected to suffering and death, so is
discipleship. Jesus commands Peter to get behind him, Jesus rebukes him
because Peter has articulated the old way of thinking in which suffering
and death have no part of God’s plan. In no uncertain terms Jesus ushers
in this new way of thinking, not as humans, but as God.
Only in
embracing the Paschal Mystery, in dying to self, and rising in Christ do
we come to understand the mystery of being saved because we have lost our
life for the sake of Jesus and the Gospel, and found that we redeemed –
even, maybe most especially, in suffering. And the reality is that, try
as we might, whether we run from the Cross, or try to find our own, the
Cross of Christ will find us.
When we
see the poor, and are tempted to dismiss human suffering with, “Go n
peace, keep warm, and eat well,” we don’t really see them as
brothers and sisters. When we spout pious platitudes, make the Cross warm
and cuddly, make suffering nice, or even pretty, we succumb to the
temptation to think as people think, and not as God thinks.
Faith and
works are inextricably connected to each other because suffering and
salvation are both so real. To believe or act otherwise is to fall into
the trap of inviting and feeding clothes to wedding celebrations, and not
people. We know all too well how difficult it is to really see,
especially when truth is right in front of us. Sometimes things aren’t as
they seem, often they are:
A monk rode an ox into town and came to a
group of people. The people asked him, “What are you looking for, monk?”
He said, “I am looking for an ox.” They all laughed. He rode his ox to
the next group of people. They asked him, “What are you looking for,
monk?” He said, “I am looking for an ox.” They all laughed. He rode his
ox to a third group of people. They asked him, “What are you looking for,
monk?” He said, “I am looking for an ox.” They said, “This is
ridiculous. You are a man riding and ox looking for an ox.” The monk
said, “So it is with you looking for God.” (John Shea, The Legend of
the Bells and Other Tales: Stories of the Human Spirit [Chicago:
ACTA Publications, 1996], 111-12).
We don’t look for the Cross, it finds us.
© Rev. Del Staigers,
2009.